On October 31, 2017 US First Lady Melania Trump filed a lawsuit against an unknown individual for $150 million dollars. The anonymous plaintiff is accused of publishing false and defamatory statements about Mrs. Trump on the internet as part of an effort to interfere with her marriage to Donald J.Trump in violation of state law and common decency”
The “prince andrew sweating” is a lawsuit that Prince Andrew filed in the US. The lawsuit was filed against Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy American financier and convicted sex offender. The suit alleges that Epstein sexually abused Prince Andrew when he was 13 years old.
It’s an extraordinary circumstance for a senior British royal — the third child (and rumored favorite son) of Queen Elizabeth II — and it sets the stage for a spectacular sequence of judicial processes that will captivate the world’s attention and potentially have enormous repercussions for Buckingham Palace.
Giuffre says she was compelled to do sex acts with the king by convicted sex offender and infamous businessman Jeffrey Epstein, charges that Andrew rejects.
According to the complaint, she is seeking damages “in an amount to be decided at trial,” as well as lawyers’ fees and other remedies “as the Court may judge fair and reasonable.”
Andrew’s lawyers submitted a move to dismiss late last year, but it was denied on Wednesday, forcing them to prepare the prince for a court appearance in New York.
Judge Lewis Kaplan said in his decision that “Giuffre’s allegation isn’t ‘incomprehensible,’ ‘vague,’ or ‘ambiguous.’ It accuses three separate occurrences of sexual assault in specific circumstances at three different places. It specifies who is to blame for the sexual assault.”
The prince’s image has already been tainted by his acquaintance with Epstein’s former partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in December for her involvement in supporting Epstein’s crimes.
Here’s all you need to know about the case and the following steps.
What assertions does Giuffre make?
Giuffre, who claims she was compelled to do sex acts with Andrew by Epstein, claims she was forced to do so. She claims she was trafficked by Epstein and forced to have sex with his pals, including the prince, when she was 17 years old and living in the United States.
Giuffre claims the assaults took place in London, New York, and the US Virgin Islands, and that Andrew was aware she was a juvenile at the time. She also claims she was trafficked by Epstein.
Giuffre said, prior to filing her case, that Epstein took her to London in 2001, where she was introduced to Prince Andrew and went dancing with Epstein, his then-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, and the prince at a nightclub.
Giuffre said in a 2019 interview that she had been escorted to the Tramp nightclub, where Andrew had urged her to dance and was “sweating all over me.”
Andrew, 61, has always refuted the allegations, telling the in 2019: “It was not to be. I can clearly state that it never took place. I have absolutely no recall of ever meeting this person.”
In the same interview, he claimed that he couldn’t sweat because of an unique medical problem, and that the night he allegedly had sex with Giuffre, he was really accompanying his daughter to a party at a Pizza Express restaurant in Woking, southwest of London.
In court papers, Giuffre’s attorneys urged Andrew to present evidence verifying both of those statements. Andrew’s side, on the other hand, said that he was unable to do so because he lacked documentation establishing a medical condition that prohibits him from sweating and was unable to identify anybody he met at the pizza parlor.
What is the status of the case in court?
Giuffre’s attorneys stated the alleged assaults caused “serious and enduring” injury when the case was filed in August.
Andrew’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, claiming that it breached the terms of a 2009 secret settlement agreement Giuffre struck with Epstein.
Epstein paid Giuffre $500,000 to drop the case without admitting liability or fault, and Giuffre agreed to “remise, release, acquit, satisfy, and forever discharge” parties and “any other person or entity who could have been included as a potential defendant,” according to the settlement, which was unsealed on January 3. It makes no mention of Andrew or anybody else.
On Wednesday, Kaplan found that “the 2009 agreement cannot be argued to establish, plainly and unmistakably, the parties intended the instrument to benefit Prince Andrew ‘directly,’ ‘mainly,’ or’substantially.’”
Andrew’s attorneys had previously attempted to have the lawsuit dismissed, claiming that the documents had not been properly served and that the case should be dropped as a consequence.
Following an order by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan last year, Andrew now has until July 14 to possibly answer questions concerning the matter under oath. According to the New York judge’s scheduling order, if Giuffre’s attorneys wish to question Andrew, they must do so outside of court and submit the interview by that date.
Andrew’s choices for moving forward are restricted as a result of Wednesday’s verdict.
He might still attempt to reach an agreement with Giuffre in order to avoid a trial. He has clearly disputed her charges on several occasions.
He also has the option of going to trial, which would expose him to further scrutiny of his alleged prior actions.
Another alternative is to decline to participate further and to surrender to the court’s jurisdiction. However, he would risk a potentially expensive default judgment if he did so.
What legal defense does Andrew have?
Andrew has disputed the charges, saying the in 2019 that “that didn’t happen.”
Andrew’s lawyers have also tried to change the story, claiming in a scathing court filing in October that Giuffre’s assertions are driven by greed. In their first pleadings for the lawsuit, Giuffre’s lawyers said that Andrew had caused her “serious and permanent mental pain.”
“Giuffre has filed this baseless lawsuit against Prince Andrew in order to obtain another payday at his expense,” Andrew’s lawyers wrote in court documents filed on October 29 — the clearest sign yet that they intend to go on the offensive in their fight to save the Queen’s third child’s reputation.
Giuffre “may well have been a victim of sexual abuse at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein,” according to the papers, “and nothing can explain, nor truly convey, the abhorrence and seriousness of Epstein’s horrible actions towards Giuffre, if that is the case.”
However, the documents also try to portray Giuffre as a money-hungry woman who is “willfully recruiting and trafficking young girls for sexual assault.”
They claim Giuffre “was taught to and did, in reality, recruit additional young women into Epstein’s sex trafficking network,” and that she has since “milked the spotlight for all she could,” implying a tumultuous judicial struggle ahead.
David Boies, Giuffre’s lawyer, did not answer to CNN’s request for comment on the claims in the court records submitted by Andrew’s attorneys at the time.
Giuffre dreaded defying Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew “because to their enormous connections, riches, and influence,” according to her attorneys’ first petition.
According to Reuters, Boies ruled in late October that Andrew’s lawyers’ request to dismiss “fails to engage the severe claims” the prince confronts.
In an October 29 filing, Andrew’s attorneys said, “Most individuals could only dream of earning the quantities of money that Giuffre has acquired for herself over the years.” “This provides Giuffre with a legitimate reason to continue launching spurious cases against people like Prince Andrew.”
When CNN contacted Prince Andrew’s attorneys, they refused to comment.
Will Andrew have to answer questions?
Andrew has already been accused of refusing to cooperate with interviews conducted as part of the investigation into the alleged sex trafficking network run by Epstein and Maxwell.
The US attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York refused to comment via a spokeswoman.
As Giuffre’s case progresses, he’ll almost certainly have to consider the mid-July deadline for answering questions under oath.
He is not expected to appear in court until then, and he is unlikely to talk to the media about the matter until then.
Since a widely panned televised interview with the’s Newsnight program in November 2019, the prince has pulled back from public obligations and maintained a low public presence.
What does this signify for the British royal family?
Andrew’s public image has been severely harmed as a result of the long-running claims against him. His attorneys recognize his “sullied reputation” in their petition to dismiss the lawsuit.
Following public and media criticism in the aftermath of the Newsnight interview, the Prince stepped down from royal responsibilities in late 2019.
He hasn’t been seen in public since his father’s death in early 2021, with the exception of a few days after his father’s death. He was also missing from photos of his eldest daughter Beatrice’s wedding in 2020, which were made public.
The issue has ramifications for the royal family, which has had to deal with criticism over Andrew’s case as well as allegations of racism from Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex during the last year.
The duke is sometimes referred to as the Queen’s favorite child in British tabloids, thus his long affiliation with Epstein and Giuffre’s charges against him signify a significant fall from grace.
While the king and other senior royals have escaped personal harm as a consequence of the Giuffre case, the thought of Andrew being obliged to answer questions under oath would be distasteful to the institution as a whole.
Lauren Said-Moorhouse of CNN contributed to this story.
Watch This Video-
The “Prince Andrew sexual abuse lawsuit” is a case that has been in the news recently. It involves Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein, an American financier who was convicted of soliciting prostitution from underage girls. The lawsuit alleges that Prince Andrew sexually abused a 13-year-old girl on three occasions in London between 2001 and 2003. Reference: prince andrew net worth.
- bbc news prince andrew latest
- prince andrew wife
- prince andrew jeffrey epstein photo
- prince andrew interview
- prince andrew latest news the sun